000			03585 a2200349 4500
001			200130713
999			_c200130713 _d30343
003			TR-AnTOB
005			20260317135225.0
008			131022s2013 enk 000 0
020			_a9781849462716
020			_a1849462712
040			_aTR-AnTOB
041			_aeng
050	0	0	_aK7680 _b.U84 2013
090			_aK7680.U84 2013
245	0	4	_aThe use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges / _ccedited by Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau.
264		1	_aOxford, United Kingdom ;Portland, Or. : _bHart Pub., _c2013
300			_axxxviii, 431 pages : _bill. ; _c25 cm
490	0		_aHart studies in comparative public law ;|vv. 1
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
505	0	0	_aIntroduction : _gPt. 2 : _gConclusion : _rTania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau --|g Pt. 1: _rCheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone. -- _rGianluca Gentili --|t India: a "critical" use of foreign precedents in constitutional adjudication / _rValentina Rita Scotti -- _rCristina Fasone -- _rSuzie Navot -- _rIrene Spigno -- _rChrista Rautenbach -- _rAnna Gamper -- _rStefan Martini -- _rZoltán Szente -- _rEduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Rubén Sánchez Gil -- _rElena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu -- _rSergey Belov -- _rWen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh -- _rAngioletta Sperti -- _rTania Groppi and Marie-Clair Ponthoreau. _tthe methodology of the research : how to assess the reality of transjudicial communication? / _tReference to foreign precedents by the Australian High Court: a matter of method / _tCanada: protecting rights in a "worldwide rights culture", an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010) / _tThe Supreme Court of Ireland and the use of foreign precedents: the value of constitutional history / _tIsrael: creating a constitution: the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010) / _tNamibia: the Supreme Court as a foreign law importer / _tSouth Africa: teaching an "old dog" new tricks? an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010) / _tAustria : non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly : the Constitutional Court's comparative approach / _tLifting the constitutional curtain? the use of foreign precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court / _tHungary : unsystematic and incoherent borrowing of law : the use of foreign judicial precedents in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010 / _tA gap between the apparent and hidden attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards foreign precedents /|rAkiko Ejima -- _tMexico : struggling for an open view in constitutional adjudication / _tRomania: analogical reasoning as a dialectical instrument / _tRussia: foreign transplants in the Russian Constitution and invisible foreign precedents in decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court / _tJudges as discursive agent : the use of foreign precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan / _tUnited States of America : first cautious attempts of judicial use of foreign precedents in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence / _tThe use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges : a limited practice, an uncertain future /
650		0	_aStare decisis _993708
650		7	_aEmsal kararlar _2etuturkob _993709
650		7	_aHükümler, Yabancı _2etuturkob _993707
650		0	_aJudgments, Foreign _993706
650		0	_aAnayasa mahkemeleri _981720
650		0	_aConstitutional courts _981601
700	1		_aGroppi, Tania _993704
700	1		_aPonthoreau, Marie-Claire _993705
942			_cBK